MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020485149 · doi:10.1089/neu.2010.1603

Chondroitinase ABC Reduces Brain Tissue Swelling <i>In Vitro</i>

2011· article· en· W2020485149 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Benjamin S. Elkin, Mohammed A. Shaik, Barclay Morrison

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurotrauma · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutomotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSwellingBrain tissueIn vitroBrain swellingNeuroscienceChemistryMedicinePathologyBiologyBiochemistrySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) caused by edema following severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) or stroke contributes to high rates of mortality and morbidity. The search continues for more effective treatments that target the edema that contributes to increased ICP. We previously described the effect of the fixed charge density (FCD) of brain on its swelling behavior according to the Donnan effect. Here we show that reduction of brain tissue FCD is an effective means of reducing brain tissue swelling and edema in rat and porcine cortical brain tissue in vitro. The effect of enzymes directed at digesting candidate contributors to cellular FCD such as chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs), heparin sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs), and DNA was examined in slices of the adult rat cortex. All enzymes were capable of decreasing FCD in the tissue by ?20%, and reducing tissue swelling over a 24?h period following dissection from ?60% to ?30%. Chondroitinase ABC (ChABC) was most effective at reducing dead brain tissue swelling in response to changes in ionic osmotic environments. ChABC reduced swelling in live slices of tissue even within the first 2?h following dissection. It also significantly reduced the FCD, initial tissue swelling, and volume change in response to hypotonic bathing solution in porcine cortical brain tissue. The use of ChABC to reduce tissue FCD may be an effective method for reducing brain edema and controlling ICP following injury.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.499

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurotraumaSame topicAutomotive and Human Injury BiomechanicsFrench-language works237,207