MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020501223 · doi:10.1021/ac101679j

Characterizing Short-Lived Protein Folding Intermediates by Top-Down Hydrogen Exchange Mass Spectrometry

2010· article· en· W2020501223 on OpenAlexafffund
Jingxi Pan, Jun Han, Christoph H. Borchers, Lars Konermann

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaWestern University
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsChemistryMass spectrometryFolding (DSP implementation)Protein foldingHydrogenChromatographyBiochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work combines pulsed hydrogen/deuterium exchange (HDX) and top-down mass spectrometry for the structural characterization of short-lived protein folding intermediates. A custom-built flow device with three sequential mixing steps is used for (i) triggering protein folding, (ii) pulsed D(2)O labeling, and (iii) acid quenching. The earliest folding time point that can be studied with this system is 10 ms. The mixing device was coupled online to the electrospray source of a Fourier transform mass spectrometer, where intact protein ions are fragmented by electron capture dissociation (ECD). The viability of this experimental strategy is demonstrated by applying it to the refolding of horse apo-myoglobin (aMb), a reaction known to involve a transient intermediate. Cooling of the mixing device to 0 °C reduces the reaction rate such that the folding process occurs within the experimentally accessible time window. Top-down ECD provides an average spatial resolution of ca. 2 residues, surpassing the resolution typically achieved in traditional proteolytic digestion/HDX studies. Amide back exchange is virtually eliminated by the short (∼1 s) duration of the acid quenching step. The aMb folding intermediate exhibits HDX protection in helices G and H, whereas the remainder of the protein is largely unfolded. Marginal protection is seen for helix A. Overall, the top-down ECD approach used here offers insights into the sequence of events leading from the unfolded state to the native conformation, with envisioned future applications in the areas of protein misfolding and aggregation. The time-resolved experiments reported herein represent an extension of our previous work, where HDX/MS with top-down ECD was employed for monitoring "static" protein structures under equilibrium conditions (Pan et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 12801).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations92
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical ChemistrySame topicMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207