MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020512128 · doi:10.1021/ma070553v

Water-Soluble CdSe Quantum Dots Passivated by a Multidentate Diblock Copolymer

2007· article· en· W2020512128 on OpenAlexaff
Mingfeng Wang, Neda Felorzabihi, Gérald Guérin, Jeffrey C. Haley, Gregory D. Scholes, Mitchell A. Winnik

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolymerQuantum yieldEthylene glycolSolubilityCopolymerPhotoluminescenceChemistryQuantum dotEthylene oxideTrioctylphosphine oxideDissociation (chemistry)Materials sciencePolymer chemistryNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryFluorescence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe a process for transferring trioctylphosphine oxide-stabilized CdSe semiconductor nanocrystals (CdSe/TOPO quantum dots, QDs) from toluene into water through a ligand exchange process with a poly(ethylene glycol- b -2- N,N -dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) (PEG- b -PDMA) diblock copolymer. In this polymer, the DMA units serve as multidentate ligands for the QD. While we expected the protruding PEG layer to enhance the water-solubility of the polymer/QD adduct, it was not sufficient, upon initial exposure to the QDs, to impart water solubility. Residual TOPO groups remained at the particle surface. Multiple exchanges with the polymer accommodated the slow dissociation of TOPO groups from the CdSe surface, and allowed the particles to achieve water solubility (dispersibility). Transfer to water was accompanied by a 10-fold decrease in the quantum yield of photoluminescence (PL), but this intensity could be recovered by photoactivation. Before photoactivation, the QDs in water showed a small decrease in PL intensity as the solutions were warmed from 25 to 55 °C, which was fully reversible when the solutions were cooled. After photoactivation, the QDs showed a similar decrease in PL intensity upon warming, but only a fraction of this loss of intensity was recovered when the sample was cooled to room temperature. At high ionic strength (0.2−1.0 M NaCl) the PL emission intensity decreased, accompanied by an increase in trap emission at longer wavelength.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations95
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesFrench-language works237,207