Nonlinear resonance behavior and linear shell estimates for Definity™ and MicroMarker™ assessed with acoustic microbubble spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is a growing interest in microbubble based ultrasound contrast imaging applications in the 5-15 MHz range. In this study, individual microbubbles were insonified at low pressures (≤ 25 kPa) using an "acoustic spectroscopy" approach which entailed transmitting a sequence of tone bursts with center frequencies ranging from 4 to 13.5 MHz. The fundamental (transmit) frequency radial excursion amplitude was calculated from the scattered signals to produce a resonance curve for each bubble. For diameters between 2.5 to 4 μm, 69% of Target-Ready MicroMarker™ (Bracco, Geneva; Visualsonics, Canada) exhibited asymmetric resonance, characterized by a skewing of the resonance curve and indicative of nonlinear behavior. For Definity™ (Lantheus Medical Imaging, N. Billerica, MA), these responses were observed for 8% of diameters between 1.7 to 3.1 μm. For the subset of bubbles exhibiting linear, symmetric resonance curves, resonant frequencies, shell elasticity, and viscosity values were estimated. Between 10 to 12 MHz, for example, Target-Ready MicroMarker between 2.7 to 3.3 μm in diameter was resonant, where Definity was resonant between 1.7 to 2.6 μm. From 4 to 13.5 MHz, Target-Ready MicroMarker is characterized by a stiffer shell (3 < χ(0) < 5) N/m than Definity (0.5 < χ(0) < 2.5) N/m, and distinct strain-softening and shear-thinning rheological behavior. For Definity, no clear strain or shear-rate dependence of the shell properties is evident.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".