MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020516892 · doi:10.1063/1.3284935

Electronic structure of nanopolycrystalline pulsed laser deposited LaB6 films and single crystals: The boron perspective

2010· article· en· W2020516892 on OpenAlexafffund
Lijia Liu, Yun Mui Yiu, T. K. Sham, Dongfang Yang, Lucia Zuin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRare-earth and actinide compounds
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)University of SaskatchewanNational Research Council CanadaWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of SaskatchewanCanadian Light Source
KeywordsXANESMaterials scienceSingle crystalPulsed laser depositionElectronic structureBoronCrystalliteAbsorption (acoustics)Absorption spectroscopyScatteringSpectroscopyMolecular physicsThin filmCondensed matter physicsCrystallographyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OpticsChemistryNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report an investigation of the electronic structure of LaB6 nanopolycrystalline pulsed laser deposited (PLD) film and single crystal with x-ray absorption near edge structures (XANES) spectroscopy at the B K-edge. The experimental results are compared with theoretical calculations using density functional theory, and real space multiple scattering. It is found that (i) the LaB6 PLD film is of high quality and metallic albeit it is a polycrystalline phase of nanocrystallites and (ii) the B K-edge XANES for the single crystal specimens exhibit well defined spectral features corresponding to the theoretical partial densities of states of B p character and the threshold energy is relatively low and free electronlike, revealing its metallic character. The implications of these observations to the enhancement in electron emission from the PLD films are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.489

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicRare-earth and actinide compoundsFrench-language works237,207