Treatment Outcomes of Unstable Proximal Phalangeal Head Fractures of the Finger in Children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Brief The authors reviewed 37 children presenting with closed, unstable fractures of the proximal phalangeal head. Fractures were classified as intra-articular (n = 15), including 14 unicondylar and 1 bicondylar, or extra-articular (n = 22), including 20 subcondylar and 2 comminuted subcondylar. Eighteen patients underwent closed reduction with K-wire fixation (n = 11) or dynamic skeletal traction (n = 7). Nineteen patients underwent open reduction with K-wire fixation (n = 14) or miniscrews (n = 5). Results were considered excellent when the active range of motion (ROM) of the proximal interphalangeal joint was ≥ 90° (n = 26); fair, active ROM, 70 to 89° (n = 6); and poor, active ROM < 70° (n = 5). The intra-articular fractures were rated 9 excellent, 5 fair, and 1 poor. The extra-articular fractures were rated 17 excellent, 1 fair, and 4 poor. The 18 closed reductions, K-wire fixation (n = 11) and traction (n = 7), were rated 16 excellent and 2 fair. The 19 open reductions, K-wire fixation (n = 14) and miniscrew fixation (n = 5), were rated 10 excellent, 4 fair, and 5 poor. Closed reduction showed better results than open reduction. Dynamic skeletal traction proved to be simple and effective in treating these injuries. A review of 37 pediatric closed, unstable fractures of the proximal phalangeal head demonstrated excellent results in 77% of extra-articular and 60% of intra-articular fractures. Closed reductions (some with dynamic skeletal traction) showed 89% excellent results, compared with 53% of open reductions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".