EFFECTIVENESS OF SOME CROWN COMPOUNDS ON INHIBITION OF POLYPHENOLOXIDASE IN MODEL SYSTEMS AND IN APPLE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Enzymatic browning is (in most cases) an undesirable reaction which usually impairs the sensory properties and chemical changes in raw fruits and vegetables after mechanical operations (such as peeling, coring or slicing). A great emphasis is put on research to develop new methods to prevent enzymatic browning especially in fresh-cut (minimally processed) fruits and vegetables. The inhibition effect of crown compounds, macrocyclic ethers, benzo-18-crown-6 with sorbic acid and benzo-18-crown-6 with potassium sorbate, on polyphenoloxidase (PPO) activity was studied. The effectiveness of these compounds was evaluated by using 3,4-dihydroxy phenylalanine (L-DOPA), and chlorogenic acid (3-o-caffeoyl-D-quinic acid), the most widespread natural PPO substrates in fruits and vegetables, as well as browning inhibition substances on the cut surface of apples. Results showed that crown compounds used in this study were effective, both as inhibitors of the oxidation of phenolic compounds (PPO substrates) in model solutions and as inhibitors of enzyme discolorations of real systems (fresh-cut apples). In the earlier published papers (V UKOVI C 'et al., 1999) the synthesis of crown compound used in this study was presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".