Coexpression of chemokine receptors CCR5, CXCR3, and CCR4 and ligands for P‐ and E‐selectin on T lymphocytes of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate P- and E-selectin ligand coexpression with chemokine receptors (CKRs) on T cells in the synovial fluid (SF) and blood of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: Sixteen patients with polyarticular or persistent oligoarticular JIA (ages 5.3-15.1 years) were studied. SF and venous blood were collected, and immunostaining for the expression of CCR4, CCR5, CXCR3, and P- or E-selectin ligands was performed. RESULTS: Compared to blood, SF was greatly enriched for CD4+ T cells bearing CCR5, CCR4, CXCR3, and both P- and E-selectin ligand. Twenty-five percent of the CD4+ T cells in SF expressed both CCR5 and CCR4, some also coexpressing CXCR3. Such cells were rare in blood. Half of the few CCR5+ T cells in blood coexpressed P- or E-selectin ligand, a phenotype that was enriched up to 50-fold in SF. A minority of CCR4+ and CXCR3+ cells in blood (∼25%) coexpressed selectin ligand; these were enriched 4-8-fold in SF. Most CCR4-expressing CD4+ T cells expressed both E-selectin ligand and cutaneous lymphocyte antigen. CONCLUSION: CCR4-, CCR5-, CXCR3-, and selectin ligand-expressing CD4+ T cells preferentially accumulate in the joints of children with JIA. The marked enrichment of CCR5+ T cells coexpressing P-selectin and/or E-selectin ligand in CD4+ SF T cells suggests that the few such cells in blood selectively migrate to inflamed joints via endothelial P- and E-selectin- and CCR5-activating chemokines. The predominance of CCR4-expressing CD4+ T cells coexpressing E-selectin ligand suggests that such cells migrate not only to areas of cutaneous inflammation, as previously reported, but also to the joints in JIA. Combined targeting of CCR5- and E-selectin-dependent mechanisms may be a relevant treatment strategy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".