Identification of a novel human cellular HDL biosynthesis defect
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Severe high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) deficiency is attributed to mutations in several genes and may contribute to the genetic basis of coronary artery disease. To identify the cellular basis of a novel HDL-deficiency phenotype, we screened 54 subjects of French Canadian ancestry with severe HDL deficiency. METHODS AND RESULTS: We excluded individuals with mutations in genes currently associated with low HDL (ABCA1, LCAT, APOA-I, and SMPD1). We identified two patients in which cellular phospholipid efflux in the HDL biosynthesis process is impaired, whereas cholesterol efflux is normal. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis analysis further showed that the two patients with impaired phospholipid efflux were defective primarily in the larger alpha-HDL subpopulations. In fibroblasts from affected subjects, oxysterol stimulation resulted in increased ABCA1 protein expression and normalized their defective phospholipid efflux defect. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate for the first time in humans that phospholipid and cholesterol efflux are two separate and distinct processes in cellular HDL biosynthesis. They further show for the first time that normal cellular phospholipid efflux is necessary for the formation of larger alpha-HDL particles. The defect in phospholipid efflux is due to defective ABCA1 protein regulation and can be corrected by treatment with physiological oxysterols, a current therapeutic target of interest, that may, with further studies, be used to raise HDL levels in patients with severe HDL deficiencies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".