Associations of osseous abnormalities in Neurofibromatosis 1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The characteristic sites of Neurofibromatosis 1-associated osseous manifestations are the long bones (usually the tibia and fibula), vertebrae and sphenoid wing. Although these focal bony lesions may cause profound clinical consequences, a minority of people with NF1 are affected. However, most people with NF1 are shorter than expected for their age, gender and family. The pathogenesis of NF1 focal osteopathy and its relationship, if any, to short stature are unknown. We examined associations between the occurrence of various osseous lesions in 3377 NF1 probands from the Children's Tumor Foundation NF International Database. Using logistic regression analysis among 260 NF1 probands who had undergone radiological examination of both the spine and skull, we found associations between the occurrence of sphenoid wing and long bone osteopathy (conditional odds ratio [OR] = 6.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.7-22.3; P = 0.006) and between sphenoid wing and vertebral osteopathy (OR = 16.9; 95% CI = 5.3-53.3; P < 0.001) after adjusting for age and gender. Similar findings were observed from all 3377 NF1 probands using a multivariate probit regression model. In a separate analysis, we found lower age- and gender-standardized height in patients who had characteristic vertebral or sphenoid wing lesions than in people who did not (P < 0.05). We found no relationship between height and tibial osteopathy. We conclude that some people with NF1 are more likely to develop osseous manifestations than others and speculate that there may be a common pathogenetic mechanism responsible for the development of osseous abnormalities and that of the vertebrae and long bones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".