Physical activity, mammographic density, and age-related lobular involution among premenopausal and postmenopausal women
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Physical activity may protect against breast cancer by modulating breast tissue composition. We evaluated the association of physical activity with two visual assessments of breast tissue composition-percentage of mammographic density (a radiologic observation) and age-related lobular involution (a histologic assessment). METHODS: Among 164 premenopausal and postmenopausal women with breast cancer, physical activity (household, occupational, and recreational) performed during the year preceding the diagnosis was evaluated using a validated questionnaire. Percentage of mammographic density was assessed in the contralateral breast by a computer-assisted method. Age-related lobular involution was assessed in normal breast tissue on H&E-stained slides. Multivariate generalized linear models were used to assess associations by quartiles of physical activity. RESULTS: Overall, we observed no significant association between total physical activity and percentage of mammographic density or degree of lobular involution. However, occupational physical activity was significantly positively associated with the predominant type I/no type III lobules among premenopausal women (last quartile: prevalence ratio [PR], 5.92; P(trend )= 0.04). Although total physical activity was positively associated with the predominant type I/no type III lobules among premenopausal women (last quartile: PR, 2.61; P(trend) = 0.08), an inverse association was observed among postmenopausal women (last quartile: PR, 0.44; P(trend) = 0.01). Higher levels of household physical activity were significantly associated with higher prevalence of lower mammographic density and complete involution among postmenopausal women (last quartile: PR, 1.21; P(trend) = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Physical activity may be associated with less dense and more involuted breasts. Physical activity's effect on mammographic density or age-related lobular involution may mediate, in part, its protective effect against breast cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".