MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2020791110 · doi:10.1029/2000jb900080

A mantle flow mechanism for the late Paleozoic subsidence of the Paraná Basin

2000· article· en· W2020791110 on OpenAlexafffund
R. N. Pysklywec, Márcia Cristina Lopes Quintas

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaPetrobras
KeywordsGeologySubductionOcean surface topographyStructural basinThermal subsidenceLithosphereMantle (geology)Tectonic subsidenceForeland basinRiftGeomorphologyPaleontologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Carboniferous‐Permian stage in the evolution of the Paraná Basin is characterized by the long‐wavelength deposition of up to ∼2.5 km of sediment in the continental interior. The tectonics of the region during this time were dominated by convergence and active subduction along the nearby Panthalassan margin of Gondwana. While subsidence in the basin is clearly related to the major tectonic events at the plate margin, there is a distinct delay between the onset of subduction and the initiation of basin deposition. This, and the nature of basin stratigraphy, suggests that the large‐scale subsidence may have been the dynamic response of the lithosphere to mantle flow associated with the penetration of accumulated slab material through the phase change at 660 km depth. We present numerical experiments of mantle convection which show that subducting slabs can stagnate at the 660 km depth phase change and intermittently penetrate through. The associated (negative) dynamic topography remains at relatively low amplitudes as the subducting material pools and then increases rapidly to a maximum during the phase of penetrative flow. We find that the predicted delay time between initial descent of the slab and the maximum surface topography corresponds with evidence from the geological record. Several models of sedimentation based on the evolving dynamic topography are presented, and a simulation generated using infill rates independently estimated for the basin provides a close fit to the amplitude and horizontal length scale of material accumulation in the Paraná Basin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres→Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→