SS01-03 - More Complete And Sustained Remission: The Key To Success In Depression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
After the initial response, the next goal is to ensure sustained remission with normal functioning and minimal residual depressive symptoms. During this phase, continued adherence to treatment is needed, which is easier if the patient perceives improvement and tolerates the treatment well. The efficacy of agomelatine, the first melatonergic antidepressant with an innovative mode of action, has been assessed in the long term in 4 studies: (1) the 18-week extension phases of two short-term studies comparing agomelatine (25-50 mg/d) with venlafaxine (75-150 mg/d), (2) a similar extension phase after 6 weeks of treatment versus sertraline 50-100 mg/d, and (3) a specific 10-month placebo-controlled relapse prevention study. At 6 months, more patients responded to treatment with agomelatine either in term of improvement in CGI-I scores as compared to venlafaxine (P< 0.05), or in terms of response rate on the HAM-D as compared to sertraline (P< 0.05). Agomelatine therefore appears to produce in more patients a relief of depressive symptoms than either SNRIs or SSRIs. A meta-analysis showed that a higher percentage of agomelatine-treated patients completed the extension period of 6 months as compared with venlafaxine or sertraline suggesting that clinical improvement induced by agomelatine lead to a better compliance to treatment. The antidepressant efficacy of agomelatine is maintained in the long term, as demonstrated by the prevention of risk of relapse by 56.3% versus placebo over a 10-month treatment period (p< 0.0001). All these features make agomelatine, the option to consider for achieving a full recovery from major depressive disorder.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.062 | 0.024 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".