Relativistic many-body calculations of excitation energies, line strengths, transition rates, and oscillator strengths in Pd-like ions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Excitation energies, line strengths, oscillator strengths, and transition probabilities are calculated for 4d14f, 4d15p, 4d15f, and 4d16p holeparticle states in Pd-like ions with nuclear charges Z ranging from 49 to 100. Relativistic many-body perturbation theory (MBPT), including the Breit interaction, is used to evaluate retarded E1 matrix elements in length and velocity forms. The calculations start from a [Kr] 4d10 closed-shell DiracHartreeFock (DHF) potential and include second- and third-order Coulomb corrections and second-order BreitCoulomb corrections. First-order perturbation theory is used to obtain intermediate-coupling coefficients and second-order MBPT is used to determine matrix elements. Contributions from negative-energy states are included in the second-order electric-dipole matrix elements. The resulting transition energies, line strengths, and transition rates are compared with experimental values and with other recent calculations. Trends of oscillator strengths as functions of nuclear charge Z are shown graphically for all transitions from the 4d14f, 4d15p, 4d15f, and 4d16p states to the ground state. PACS Nos.: 31.15.Ar, 31.15.Md, 32.70.Cs, 32.30.Rj, 31.25.Jf
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".