Bibliographic record
Abstract
The auditory cortex undergoes anatomical and functional development that reflects specialization for learned sounds. Auditory maturation is evident in the transient auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) and auditory phase-locked oscillatory activity. Development of AEPs and the phase-locking strength of oscillatory auditory responses to piano, violin, and pure tones were examined. The hypothesis was that if oscillatory activity in different frequency bands reflects different aspects of sound processing, then the development of phase-locking at these frequencies will have different maturational trajectories. Phase-locking for theta (4–8 Hz), alpha (8–14 Hz), lower-to-mid-beta (14–25 Hz), and upper beta and gamma (25–70 Hz) bands strengthened with age and was stronger for musical than pure tones. The phase-locking increase for gamma and upper beta bands mainly reflected the maturation of the spectral representations for sounds. In contrast, increase in phase-locking for theta, alpha, and lower-to-mid-beta was mainly attributed to sensitivity to sound temporal onset rise time. Frequency-specific phase-locking provides a tool to assess auditory development for spectral and temporal aspects of naturalistic complex sounds. [This research was supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders.]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".