MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020987782 · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/42/1/018

Enumeration Bounds via an Isoperimetric-Type Inequality

2006· article· en· W2020987782 on OpenAlexafffund
Neal Madras

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometric and Algebraic Topology
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsIsoperimetric inequalityMathematicsCombinatoricsEnumerationUpper and lower boundsHyperplaneCardinality (data modeling)Lattice (music)ExponentInequalityDiscrete mathematicsMathematical analysisPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1949, Loomis and Whitney published a geometrically intuitive inequality that bounds the cardinality of a d-dimensional set in terms of the cardinalities of its projections onto the coordinate hyperplanes. We show how this inequality can be used to prove two results in the asymptotic enumeration of lattice animals: a bound on the critical exponent for the number of lattice animals in arbitrary dimension, and a bound on the growth constant for the number of ''almost unknotted'' embeddings of graphs in the cubic lattice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.162
Threshold uncertainty score0.465

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicGeometric and Algebraic TopologyFrench-language works237,207