MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Self‐Similarity and the Evaluation of Long‐Time Nonhydrostatic Effects in Compositionally Driven Gravity Flows in Deep Surroundings

2005· article· en· W2021009225 on OpenAlex
Nalan Antar, T. B. Moodie

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Applied Mathematics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHydrostatic equilibriumContext (archaeology)Gravity currentMechanicsFlow (mathematics)GeologyShallow water equationsEuler equationsAmplitudeHydrostatic pressureGeometryMathematicsClassical mechanicsPhysicsMathematical analysisOpticsInternal wave

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the study of compositionally driven gravity currents involving one or more homogeneous fluid layers, it has been customary to adopt the hydrostatic assumption for the pressure field in each layer which, in turn, leads to a depth‐independent horizontal velocity field in each of these layers and significant simplifications to the governing equations. Under this hydrostatic paradigm, each layer will then have its motion governed by the well‐known reduced dimension shallow‐water equations. For the so‐called ‐layer or reduced gravity shallow‐water equations, similarity solutions for fixed volume gravity currents released in rectangular geometry have been found. Very few attempts have been made to evaluate contributions arising from the possible loss of hydrostatic balance in the context of the problems treated using the classic shallow‐water approach. Where such attempts have been pursued, they have usually been carried out in a time‐independent context or using layer‐averaged equations and very small amplitude disturbances. The vast majority of these studies into nonhydrostatic effects do not include any relevant numerical work to assess these effects. In this paper, we develop an approach for evaluating nonhydrostatic contributions to the flow field for bottom gravity currents in deep surroundings and rectangular geometry. Our approach makes no assumptions on the amplitudes of the disturbances and does not depend on layer‐averaging in the governing equations. We seek asymptotic expansions of the solutions to the Euler equations for a shallow fluid by using the small parameter δ 2 , where δ is the aspect ratio of the flow regime. At leading order the equations enforce hydrostatic balance while those obtained at first order retain certain nonhydrostatic effects which we evaluate. Our method for evaluation of these first‐order contributions employs the self‐similar nature of the solution to the leading‐order equations in the new first‐order equations without any vertical averaging procedures being employed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.349
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it