MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021048893 · doi:10.1071/rdv18n2ab274

274 LAPAROSCOPIC OVUM PICK-UP IN SHEEP AND GOATS: EFFECTS OF REPEATED RECOVERIES AND FOLLICULAR DIAMETER

2005· article· en· W2021048893 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A. Gibbons, F. Pereyra Bonnet, M. Cueto, M. G. Catalá, D. Salamone

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFollicular phaseBiologyFollicleOocyteAnimal scienceAndrologyFollicular fluidAnatomyEmbryoEndocrinologyMedicineFishery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Laparoscopic ovum pickup (LOPU) is a modern technique that may be used in programs of sheep and goat in vitro embryo production. The effects of repeated recoveries and follicular diameter on the efficiency of LOPU were evaluated in these species. In six Merino donor sheep and five Criolla goats, ovarian stimulation for follicular development was performed by administering a single dose of 60 mg NIH-FSH-P1 (Folltropin®; Bioniche, Canada) and 300 UI of eCG (Novoromon 5000®; Syntex, Argentina). Every four days, a total of 4 LOPU in sheep and 3 in goats were performed 24 h after each ovarian stimulation treatment. The intravaginal sponge with 60 mg of medroxyprogesterone (Esponjas Vaginales Syntex®; Syntex, Argentina) were removed after the last LOPU. Follicular fluid was aspirated under laparoscopic observation according to the follicle diameter with a cannula for intrauterine artificial insemination without a vacuum pump. The number and size of follicles, oocyte quantity and quality and recovery rate were evaluated. A total of 566 follicles were aspirated (14.4 ± 2.4 follicles/sheep and 14.6 ± 7.5 follicles/goat), yielding a total of 263 oocytes (6.8 ± 1.5 oocytes/sheep and 6.6 ± 2.9 oocytes/goat) and a recovery rate of 47% in sheep and 46% in goats (Table 1). In both species, there were no significant differences in the number of aspirated follicles, recovered oocytes, overall recovery rate, and the recovery rate of good quality oocytes in the repeated LOPU. The oocyte recovery rates in sheep differed significantly according to the follicular size (55% in large follicles, 36% in small follicles; P < 0.05), whereas in goats recovery rates of oocytes related to follicular size showed no significant differences (42 and 54% for large and small follicles, respectively). Follicular sizes from which oocytes were obtained was not a determining factor in the recovery rate of good quality oocytes. The technique used would allow effective and repeated oocyte recoveries for in vitro embryo production in sheep and goats. Table 1. Repeated recoveries by laparoscopic ovum pickup (LOPU) in sheep and goats

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.567

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207