MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021060168 · doi:10.1039/c3an01374j

Design of a universal biointerface for sensitive, selective, and multiplex detection of biomarkers using surface plasmon resonance imaging

2013· article· en· W2021060168 on OpenAlexaff
Arghavan Shabani, Maryam Tabrizian

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Analyst · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersSteadman Philippon Research Institute
KeywordsMultiplexSurface plasmon resonanceBiointerfaceChemistryBiotinylationQuantum dotStreptavidinNanotechnologyBiophysicsMaterials scienceBiotinNanoparticleBiochemistryBioinformatics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reports on the sensitive, selective, and simultaneous detection of four protein biomarkers involved in metastasis of various cancers, namely Fas, angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and matrix metallopeptidase-9 (MMP-9) using an antibody-conjugated quantum dot (QD) chip and surface plasmon resonance imaging (SPRi) biosensors. Initially, a self-assembled monolayer film of l-cysteine, using glutaraldehyde as a linker and QDs as signal enhancement moieties, was employed to immobilize anti-Fas for the detection of Fas as a model protein in buffer. The biointerface was characterized using confocal microscopy, atomic force microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy to provide evidence of uniform surface coverage by the QDs. The SPRi signal was enhanced 100-fold to achieve a detection limit of 25 pg mL(-1) after applying biotinylated detection antibody-conjugate streptavidin-modified QDs. Secondly, this signal amplification strategy was applied to sequentially detect Fas, HER2, MMP-9, and Ang-2 at low concentrations on a protein-microprinted/gold-coated SPRi chip. The results showed the absence of cross-reactivity among these proteins and the feasibility of the approach for multiplex detection of biomarkers as required for the accurate diagnosis of various diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.263
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe AnalystSame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207