MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021102874 · doi:10.1021/jp053727o

Mechanism of Cis/Trans Equilibration of Alkenes via Iodine Catalysis

2005· article· en· W2021102874 on OpenAlexaff
Steven S. Hepperle, Qing-Bin Li, Allan L. L. East

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAsymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersMike and Josie Harper Cancer Research Institute
KeywordsAlkeneIsomerizationChemistrySteric effectsComputational chemistryCatalysisReaction mechanismPhotochemistryMechanism (biology)Atom (system on chip)Wittig reactionIodineStereochemistryOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Iodine is commonly used to speed the equilibration of Wittig cis/trans alkene products. This study uses computational chemistry to study the catalyzed isomerization mechanism in detail for seven different examples of 1,2-disubstituted alkenes. We find that the iodo intermediates of the conventional three-step reaction path are weakly stable, bound by less than 7 kJ mol(-1) in five cases and nonexistent in the other two. These variations in relative stability appear to be closely related to the degree of conjugation interruption in the alkene upon attachment of iodine. The rate-determining reaction barrier always occurs in the middle step, the internal rotation of the iodo intermediate, and the variations in the barrier heights are dictated by varying levels of steric hindrance in the seven cases. Regiospecificity of I-atom addition and noticeable hyperconjugative effects are discussed. Comparisons between various theoretical approximations are performed to demonstrate the great difficulty in obtaining accurate results for iodine-atom bond-forming and bond-breaking energies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicAsymmetric Synthesis and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207