MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021156719 · doi:10.1021/ie0504194

Applications of Pore-Expanded Mesoporous Silica. 2. Development of a High-Capacity, Water-Tolerant Adsorbent for CO<sub>2</sub>

2005· article· en· W2021156719 on OpenAlexafffund
R Franchi, Peter J. E. Harlick, Abdelhamid Sayari

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanada Research ChairsGovernment of Canada
KeywordsAdsorptionChemical engineeringZeoliteMCM-41DiethanolamineDesorptionMesoporous silicaMesoporous materialMaterials scienceAmine gas treatingMolecular sieveActivated carbonChromatographyChemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel high-capacity, water-tolerant adsorbent for CO 2 was developed. It consisted of diethanolamine (DEA) loaded pore-expanded MCM-41 silica (PE-MCM-41). Due to its very large pore volume, PE-MCM-41 silica was capable of accommodating a greater quantity of amine resulting in higher CO 2 adsorption capacity compared to the other supports including activated carbon, silica gel, and standard MCM-41 silica. Adsorption measurements were conducted by gravimetry using dry CO 2 to obtain uptake curves and apparent rate data. The capacity and uptake rate reached maxima with respect to amine content and then declined due to the deposition of excess amine on the particle's external surface and within the interparticle voids. At CO 2 partial pressures below 0.15 atm, the current DEA loaded PE-MCM-41 adsorbent was found to be superior to the more conventional zeolite 13X. Adsorption studies with humid CO 2 revealed that the adsorption capacity of the PE-MCM-41-based material was insensitive to the presence of moisture, which represents a major advantage over zeolite 13X. Repeated adsorption−desorption cycles revealed that our novel adsorbent exhibited good cyclic stability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations393
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207