Mechanisms of Formation of Structural Variation in a Fully Sequenced Human Genome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Even with significant advances in technology, few studies of structural variation have yet resolved to the level of the precise nucleotide junction. We examined the sequence of 408,532 gains, 383,804 losses, and 166 inversions from the first sequenced personal genome, to quantify the relative proportion of mutational mechanisms. Among small variants (<1 kb), we observed that 72.6% of them were associated with nonhomologous processes and 24.9% with microsatellites events. Medium-size variants (<10 kb) were commonly related to minisatellites (25.8%) and retrotransposons (24%), whereas 46.2% of large variants (>10 kb) were associated with nonallelic homologous recombination. We genotyped eight new breakpoint-resolved inversions at (3q26.1, Xp11.22, 7q11.22, 16q23.1, 4q22.1, 1q31.3, 6q27, and 16q24.1) in human populations to elucidate the structure of these presumed benign variants. Three of these inversions (3q26.1, 7q11.22, and 16q23.1) were accompanied by unexpected complex rearrangements. In particular, the 16q23.1 inversion and an accompanying deletion would create conjoined chymotrypsinogen genes (CTRB1 and CTRB2), disrupt their gene structure, and exhibit differentiated allelic frequencies among populations. Also, two loci (Xp11.3 and 6q27) of potential reference assembly orientation errors were found. This study provides a thorough account of formation mechanisms for structural variants, and reveals a glimpse of the dynamic structure of inversions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".