MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021217111 · doi:10.1097/cpm.0b013e318150c96d

Outcome of Lung Cancer Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit

2007· article· en· W2021217111 on OpenAlexaff
Jerry Maniate, Sri Navaratnam, Mary Cheang, Sat Sharma

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Pulmonary Medicine · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsCancerCare Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLung cancerEmergency medicineIntensive care unitMortality rateMedical recordMechanical ventilationAPACHE IIRetrospective cohort studyIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Brief We investigate the outcome of lung cancer patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit (MICU) and examine potential predictors of mortality. A retrospective quality assurance study of primary lung cancer patients admitted to the MICUs at 2 local tertiary care university hospitals from January 1, 1994 to May 12, 2004 was conducted (n = 69). Data on demographics and tumor-related data were collected using the hospital records of all patients admitted to MICU with a diagnosis of lung cancer. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the prognostic factors associated with MICU and hospital mortality as well as MICU and hospital lengths of stay. The MICU mortality rate was 50.7% and the mean MICU length of stay was 3.0 days. Multivariate analysis determined that Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) scores, Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System scores, and non-small cell lung cancer were significantly associated with MICU mortality, whereas age and APACHE II scores were associated with hospital mortality. Respiratory failure upon admission and use of a Swan Ganz monitor were predictors of increased MICU length of stay, and chemotherapy administration and mechanical ventilation predicted increased hospital length of stay. The 50.7% mortality rate for patients with previously or newly diagnosed primary lung cancer admitted to the MICU is lower than the previously reported mortality rate of 66.7% for a period of 1986. Although the mortality remains high, an improvement over the previous decade has occurred and is comparable to that for patients requiring MICU admission for other indications. There is a high mortality rate associated with medical intensive care unit (MICU) admission for patients with previously or newly diagnosed primary lung cancer. However, it has improved over the previous decade and is comparable to that among patients requiring MICU admission for other illness such as pneumonia, adult respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Pulmonary MedicineSame topicLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207