MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021269877 · doi:10.1111/jace.12021

Tuning Hydrophobicity with Honeycomb Surface Structure and Hydrophilicity with <scp> <scp>CF</scp> </scp> <sub>4</sub> Plasma Etching for Aerosol‐Deposited Titania Films

2012· article· en· W2021269877 on OpenAlexaff
Do‐Yeon Kim, J.H. Park, Jong‐Gun Lee, Min‐Wook Lee, Ho‐Young Kim, Joon‐Ho Oh, Tae‐Yeon Seong, Dong‐Hwan Kim, Scott James, Maikel F. A. M. van Hest, S. Chandra, Sam S. Yoon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Ceramic Society · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSurface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuperhydrophilicityContact angleMaterials scienceWettingChemical engineeringEtching (microfabrication)X-ray photoelectron spectroscopyHoneycombSurface energyDeposition (geology)Honeycomb structureCoatingNanotechnologyComposite materialLayer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A tunable surface that promotes either hydrophobic or hydrophilic behavior of TiO 2 films is produced with aerosol deposition. This process is capable of mass production by high‐speed coating at room temperature without any wet chemicals, and therefore the process has the potential to be economically viable, energy efficient, and environmentally friendly. Functional TiO 2 films between 1 and 18 μm thick are produced by directly depositing dry, 1‐μm TiO 2 powders accelerated through a supersonic nozzle. Tunable film morphology due to a rough honeycomb surface structure yields variable water contact angles. When plasma treated with CF 4 , the films exhibit superhydrophilicity despite the rough honeycomb surface structure. Superhydrophilicity is due to the incorporation of fluorine in the film as shown using XPS .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Ceramic SocietySame topicSurface Modification and SuperhydrophobicityFrench-language works237,207