Circulating Glycated Albumin and Glomerular Anionic Charges
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aiming to discern the mechanisms by which circulating glycated albumin alters the glomerular filtration properties that lead to glomerular dysfunction in diabetes, the authors studied the distribution and densities of anionic charges through the rat glomerular wall upon intravascular infusion of Amadori products, as well as in various conditions of increased glomerular permselectivity. Polylysine-gold was used as the probe to reveal the anionic charges. The study was carried on renal tissue sections of bovine serum albumin (BSA)- and glycated BSA-injected, normoglycemic animals. Results were generated through morphometrical evaluations of the gold labeling. Changes in glomerular anionic distribution were corroborated on renal tissue sections of short- and long-term diabetic rats and of normal newborn rats, situations known for abnormal glomerular filtration. Altered renal function in these conditions was clearly associated with changes in glomerular anionic charges. On the other hand, the infusion of glycated albumin in the circulation of normal rats, though altering glomerular filtration properties, did not modify the distribution and density of the polylysine-gold labeling through the glomerular basement membrane. Thus, anionic charges seem not to be the factor involved in the early changes of glomerular permeability induced by circulating glycated albumin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".