MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021281845 · doi:10.1021/ie801195b

Natural Convection Mass Transfer Behavior of Fixed Bed of Spheres in Relation to Catalytic and Electrochemical Reactor Design

2009· article· en· W2021281845 on OpenAlexaff
Ibrahim Hassan, Inderjit Nirdosh, Gomaa H. Sedahmed

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMass transferRaschig ringSPHERESLimiting currentNatural convectionElectrochemistryDiffusionMass transfer coefficientChemistryMass fractionThermodynamicsConvectionChemical engineeringMaterials sciencePacked bedAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChromatographyElectrodePhysical chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The free convection mass transfer behavior of a fixed bed of spheres has been studied experimentally using an electrochemical technique which involved measuring the limiting current of the cathodic deposition of copper from acidified copper sulfate solution. Variables studied were sphere diameter, bed height, and physical properties of the solution. The mass transfer coefficient was found to decrease slightly with increasing bed height and independent of sphere diameter. The data were correlated for the conditions 5 × 10 6 < Sc · Gr < 5.4 × 10 8 by the equation Sh = 0.28( Sc · Gr ) 0.32 . A comparison between the present and some previous data at other packing geometries shows that the rate of natural convection mass transfer at a bed of spheres is higher than that at beds of Raschig rings and at cylinders. The importance of the present results for the design and operation of catalytic and electrochemical reactors used to conduct diffusion controlled liquid−solid reactions is highlighted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.672

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicNanofluid Flow and Heat TransferFrench-language works237,207