Plasticity of enteric nerve functions in the inflamed and postinflamed gut
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inflammation of the gut alters the properties of the intrinsic and extrinsic neurons that innervate it. While the mechanisms of neuroplasticity differ amongst the inflammatory models that have been used, amongst various regions of the gut, and between intrinsic vs extrinsic neurons, a number of consistent features have been observed. For example, intrinsic and extrinsic primary afferent neurons become hyperexcitable in response to inflammation, and interneuronal synaptic transmission is facilitated in the enteric circuitry. These changes contribute to alterations in gut function and sensation in the inflamed bowel as well as functional disorders, and these changes persist for weeks beyond the point at which detectable inflammation has subsided. Thus, gaining a more thorough understanding of the mechanisms responsible for inflammation-induced neuroplasticity, and strategies to reverse these changes are clinically relevant goals. The purpose of this review is to summarize our current knowledge regarding neurophysiological changes that occur during and following intestinal inflammation, and to identify and address gaps in our knowledge regarding the role of enteric neuroplasticity in inflammatory and functional gastrointestinal disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".