MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2021302940 · doi:10.1253/jcj.65.414

Is Inflammation Related to the Clinical Severity of Unstable Angina?

2001· article· en· W2021302940 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sunao Kojima, Hiroshi Nonogi, Isao Morii, Hitoshi Sumida, Yasuo Sutani, Satoshi Yasuda, Satoshi Daikoku, Yoichi Goto, Shunichi Miyazaki

Bibliographic record

VenueJapanese Circulation Journal · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineCardiologyAnginaUnstable anginaWhite blood cellC-reactive proteinRefractory (planetary science)SpasticCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyAcute coronary syndromeInflammationMyocardial infarctionPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study determined the white blood cell (WBC) count and the serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level in 27 patients with coronary spastic angina, 16 with Braunwald class IB unstable angina (UA) and 13 with Braunwald class IIIB. The relationship between the clinical presentation of UA and the requirement for emergency percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) was examined, and in patients with medically refractory angina, the determining factor among the clinical manifestations of angina was also investigated. In the acute phase, the WBC count and the serum CRP level were significantly higher in patients with Braunwald class IIIB than in those with coronary spastic angina or Braunwald class IB UA (p<0.001). In the Braunwald class IIIB group, a significantly higher rate of patients required emergency PTCA than that of the coronary spastic angina group (p<0.01). Patients with medically refractory angina had a significantly higher WBC count and higher serum CRP level on admission, and the WBC count on admission was independently associated with medically refractory angina by multivariate analysis (p<0.05). Inflammation may play a major pathological role in the rapid development of acute coronary syndrome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJapanese Circulation Journal→Same topicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→