MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021329002 · doi:10.4153/cmb-2006-019-4

On the Inequality for Volume and Minkowskian Thickness

2006· article· en· W2021329002 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gennadiy Averkov

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Mathematical Bulletin · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicPoint processes and geometric inequalities
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsConvex bodyParallelogramUnit sphereCombinatoricsRegular polygonSimplexBanach spaceMinkowski spaceBall (mathematics)Isoperimetric inequalityMixed volumeMathematical analysisPure mathematicsGeometryConvex hull

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Given a centrally symmetric convex bodyBin , we denote by ℳd(B) the Minkowski space (i.e., finite dimensional Banach space) with unit ballB. LetKbe an arbitrary convex body in ℳd(B). The relationship between volumeV(K) and the Minkowskian thickness (= minimal width) ΔB(K) ofKcan naturally be given by the sharp geometric inequalityV(K) ≥ α(B) · ΔB(K)d, where α(B) > 0. As a simple corollary of the Rogers-Shephard inequality we obtain that with equality on the left attained if and only ifBis the difference body of a simplex and on the right ifBis a cross-polytope. The main result of this paper is that ford= 2 the equality on the right implies thatBis a parallelogram. The obtained results yield the sharp upper bound for the modified Banach–Mazur distance to the regular hexagon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0020.006
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Mathematical BulletinSame topicPoint processes and geometric inequalitiesFrench-language works237,207