MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021364948 · doi:10.1159/000203557

Characteristics of a Cell Line Established from a Case of Acute Megakaryoblastic Leukemia

2009· article· en· W2021364948 on OpenAlexaff
Leo F. Skinnider, P. Pabello, Cuijuan Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Haematologica · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcute megakaryoblastic leukemiaPathologyBone marrowKaryotypeAcute promyelocytic leukemiaMarker chromosomeIsochromosomeBiologyChromosomePrecursor cellLeukemiaMolecular biologyPromyelocyteCell cultureImmunologyMedicineCellGeneticsRetinoic acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acute megakaryoblastic leukemia is uncommon and comprises about 5% of acute nonlymphoid leukemias in the French-American-British classification. Cell lines from such leukemias are relatively rare with only about 8 reported in the literature. We established a cell line from a case of acute megakaryoblastic leukemia arising in a 2-year-old child. Surface marker studies of the cells confirmed their megakaryoblastic nature, with 54% of the cells being CD61 positive and peroxidase and esterase negative. The cells had a doubling time of 72 h. Emperipolesis (a phenomenon in which a cell, usually a lymphocyte or neutrophil, enters another cell, moves about and leaves without undergoing phagocytosis) of one blast into another, larger one, was occasionally seen, and a review of the original bone marrow specimen also showed emperipolesis of neutrophils into the megakaryoblasts. The cells responded to interleukin 3 and were inhibited with all-trans-retinoic acid. The karyotype of the cells was the 46,XX,-16 with a marker chromosome. The marker chromosome is possibly chromosome 16 with a small segment of a chromosome translocated to the terminal portion of chromosome 16.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.949

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa HaematologicaSame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207