Site-Directed Spin-Labeling of the Catalytic Sites Yields Insight into Structural Changes within the F<sub>o</sub>F<sub>1</sub>-ATP Synthase of <i>Escherichia coli</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy using site-specific cysteine spin-labeling of the catalytic nucleotide binding sites of F(1)-ATPase was employed to investigate conformational changes within the nucleotide binding sites of the enzyme. Mutant Escherichia coli F(1) that had been modified at position beta-Y331C with a spin label showed almost normal catalytic activity and enabled us to study the effects of binding of different nucleotides and of the F(o) subunit b on the conformation of the catalytic binding sites. The ESR spectra of the spin-labeled, nucleotide-depleted F(1) indicate asymmetry within the sites as is expected from the structural models of the enzyme. Nucleotide binding to the enzyme clearly affects the conformation of the sites; the most pronounced feature upon nucleotide binding is the formation of catalytic site(s) in a very open conformation. Using the same beta-331 spin-labeled F(1) and a truncated form of F(o) subunit b, b(24)(-)(156), we found that binding of b(24)(-)(156) to spin-labeled F(1) significantly changes the conformation of the catalytic sites. In this paper we present data that for the first time directly show that a conformational binding change takes place upon binding of nucleotides to the nucleotide binding sites and that also show that binding of b(24)(-)(156) strongly affects the conformation of the catalytic sites, most likely by increasing the population of binding sites that are in the open conformation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".