Field Sampling and Determination of Formaldehyde in Indoor Air with Solid-Phase Microextraction and On-Fiber Derivatization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new sampling and analysis method for formaldehyde in indoor air was tested in several indoor air surveys. The method was based on the use of solid-phase microextraction (SPME) poly(dimethylsiloxane)/divinylbenzene,65-microm fiber and gas chromatography. Indoor air surveys included grab and time-weighted average (TWA) sampling and were completed at six locations using (a) the SPME method employing on-fiber formaldehyde derivatization with o-(2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorobenzyl)hydroxylamine hydrochloride and (b)the conventional National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) 2451 method. Sampling time for SPME fiber ranged from 10 min for grab sampling to 8 h for TWA sampling. Sampling locations included a residential house, a rental apartment, an office building, and industrial workplaces. The air concentrations measured by SPME ranged from 10 to 380 ppbv and correlated well with those estimated by the NIOSH method. Results also indicated thatin some cases the formaldehyde concentrations measured in residential air could be much higher than those allowed in occupational settings. The SPME method proved to be accurate, fast, sensitive, and cost-efficient in field sampling applications. This research should be of interest to research, industrial, and regulatory agencies as well as to the general public concerned with indoor air quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it