Cast joining of cast iron to aluminium casting matrix
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study focused on reinforcing Al–Si–Cu alloy with a cast iron insert and using Zn– xAl–3Si–0·5Mg (wt-) intermediate alloys by the cast joining technique to take advantage of lightness and stiffness of the hybrid structure. The experimental set-up consisted of coating the insert using hot dipping method followed by immersing the coated insert into the Al melt and allowing the system to cool down to the room temperature. The quality of Al–Fe joints in terms of morphology, thickness, chemistry and microhardness was evaluated as a function of coating composition and immersion time in the Al melt. Characteristics of reaction layer at the coating/insert interface and its effects on the joint properties were determined using microstructural analysis and thermodynamic calculations. Combination of a suitable coating containing 27 wt-Al and optimised process parameters, including 1 min immersion time, resulted in the formation of an Al–Fe joint with promising characteristics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it