Hyperosmolarity alters micturition: a comparison of urinary bladder motor activity in hyperosmolar and cyclophosphamide-induced models of overactive bladder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hyperosmolar factors induce the neurogenic inflammatory response, leading to bladder overactivity (OAB). The aim of the study was to compare the bladder motor activity in a hyperosmolar and acute cyclophosphamide (CYP)-induced model of OAB. Furthermore, we set our sights on defining the most physiological model of OAB in experimental practice. Forty-two female rats were divided randomly into 5 groups. All animals underwent cystometry with the usage of isotonic saline or saline of increasing concentration. Acute chemical cystitis was induced by CYP to elicit OAB. The following cystometric parameters were analyzed: basal pressure, threshold pressure, micturition voiding pressure, intercontraction interval, compliance, functional bladder capacity, motility index, and detrusor overactivity index. CYP and hypertonic saline solutions induced OAB. Having been compared with CYP OAB, none of the rats infused with hypertonic solution exhibited macroscopic signs of bladder inflammation. The comparison of CYP and hyperosmolar models of OAB revealed that the greatest similarity existed between the 2080 mOsm/L OAB model and the acute CYP-induced model. We postulate that the 2080 mOsm/L model of OAB can be established as being a less invasive and more physiological model when compared with the CYP-induced OAB model. Additionally, it may also be a more reliable experimental tool for evaluating novel therapeutics for OAB as compared with CYP-induced models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".