MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021540433 · doi:10.3168/jds.2013-6744

Accuracy of milk ketone bodies from flow-injection analysis for the diagnosis of hyperketonemia in dairy cows

2014· article· en· W2021540433 on OpenAlexafffund
J. Denis-Robichaud, J. Dubuc, D. Lefebvre, Luc DesCôteaux

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsValacta (Canada)Cegep de Saint HyacintheUniversité de Montréal
FundersUniversité de MontréalPfizer
KeywordsAcetoneAnimal scienceChemistryDairy cattlePopulationHerdInternal medicineMedicineBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objectives of this study were (1) to determine the correlations between blood β-hydroxybutyrate (BHBA) and milk components [BHBA, acetone, fat, protein, and fat:protein (F:P) ratio], and (2) to establish optimal thresholds for milk components to predict hyperketonemia in dairy cows. Data on 163 cows from 37 herds were used in this cross-sectional study. Herds were visited once during the study period, and cows between 2 and 90 d in milk were blood sampled within 4h of milk sampling for the Dairy Herd Improvement test. Blood BHBA concentrations were measured using a cow-side electronic meter, Precision Xtra, which was considered the gold standard test in this study. Milk BHBA and acetone concentrations were measured in Dairy Herd Improvement milk samples by flow-injection analysis; whereas, milk fat and protein were tested using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Hyperketonemia was defined by a blood BHBA concentration ≥ 1.4 mmol/L. The prevalence of hyperketonemia (based on blood BHBA values) in this study population was 21.0%. Pearson correlation coefficients between blood BHBA and milk BHBA, acetone, fat, protein, and F:P ratio were 0.89, 0.73, 0.21, 0.04, and 0.17, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated and thresholds for each individual milk component were determined based on the maximal sum of sensitivity and specificity. Optimal threshold values for hyperketonemia were milk BHBA ≥ 0.20 mmol/L, acetone ≥ 0.08 mmol/L, fat ≥ 4.2%, and F:P ratio ≥ 1.3. Based on these thresholds, milk BHBA and acetone had greater sensitivity (84 and 87%, respectively) and greater specificity (96 and 95%, respectively) than the other milk components (fat, protein, and F:P). Series and parallel testing slightly improved the accuracy of milk BHBA and acetone values to predict hyperketonemia. A multivariable model that accounted for milk BHBA and milk acetone values simultaneously had the highest accuracy of all tested models for predicting hyperketonemia. These results support that milk BHBA and milk acetone values from flow-injection analysis are accurate diagnostic tools for hyperketonemia in dairy cows and could potentially be used for herd-level hyperketonemia surveillance programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score0.284

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations75
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207