MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021568221 · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2008.11.002

Neuropathic pain behaviours in a chronic-relapsing model of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE)

2008· article· en· W2021568221 on OpenAlexaff
Camille Olechowski, Janet J. Truong, Bradley J. Kerr

Bibliographic record

VenuePain · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersMultiple Sclerosis Society
KeywordsAllodyniaExperimental autoimmune encephalomyelitisMedicineNeuropathic painMyelin oligodendrocyte glycoproteinMultiple sclerosisChronic painImmunologyGliosisAstrocyteSpinal cordHyperalgesiaNeuroscienceCentral nervous systemPathologyNociceptionAnesthesiaInternal medicineBiologyReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS). While the primary symptoms of MS are losses of sensory and motor functions, it is now recognized that chronic pain is also a major concern affecting between 50% and 80% of MS patients. To date, however, few studies have examined the underlying mechanisms of chronic pain in MS or in the animal model, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), which shares many features of MS pathology. We, therefore, set out to characterize the changes in pain sensitivity that arises in a chronic-relapsing model of EAE. We show here that female C57BL/6 mice immunized with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG(35-55)) develop a robust allodynia to both cold and tactile stimuli. Allodynia emerges early in the disease process, often before any signs of neurological deficit and is independent of the overall symptom severity in these mice. "Classical" cellular substrates for neuropathic pain and allodynia such as altered expression of sensory neuropeptides in the dorsal horn of the spinal do not appear to underlie these changes in sensory function. There is, however, a significant influx of CD3+ T cells and increased astrocyte and microglia/macrophage reactivity in the superficial dorsal horn of mice with MOG(35-55) EAE. This suggests that inflammation and reactive gliosis may be key mediators of allodynia in MOG(35-55) EAE similar to peripheral nerve and spinal cord injury models. Taken together, our results show that the MOG(35-55) EAE model is a useful tool to study neuropathic pain in MS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.674

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations159
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePainSame topicPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207