MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Experimental Confirmation of Kelvin’s Equilibria

2008· article· en· W2021614649 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFroude numberPhysicsVortexCylinderRotation (mathematics)Core (optical fiber)MechanicsClassical mechanicsCondensed matter physicsOpticsGeometryMathematicsFlow (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We experimentally corroborate the core analytical deductions of Thomson's 124-year-old theorem, vis-à-vis the stability of a ring of N vortices. Observations made in water vortices produced inside a cylinder via a revolving disk confirm that the regular N-gons are stable for N<or=6 and unstable for N>or=8. The N<or=6 equilibria are exceptionally resilient. When destroyed, they reemerge in their original form. We reason that the heptagonal system either survives in an exceedingly narrow band of disk speeds or is in theory critically stable. Contrary to the results with a rotating bottom reported by Jansson et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 174502 (2006)10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.174502], we show the interfacial axial symmetry does not break spontaneously but through spectral development, the functional relationship amongst the polygon rotation and disk speed is surprisingly simple, and the pattern to disk frequency ratio depends on both Froude and wave numbers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score0.268

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it