MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021649310 · doi:10.1002/nau.23551

6th International Consultation on Incontinence. Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: EVALUATION AND TREATMENT OF URINARY INCONTINENCE, PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE AND FAECAL INCONTINENCE

2018· article· en· W2021649310 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Abrams, Karl‐Erik Andersson, Apostolos Apostolidis, Lori A. Birder, Donna Z. Bliss, Linda Brubaker, Linda Cardozo, David Castro‐Díaz, P. R. O’Connell, Alan Cottenden, Nikki Cotterill, Dirk De Ridder, Roger R. Dmochowski, Chantale Dumoulin, Mandy Fader, Christopher Fry, Howard B. Goldman, Philip M. Hanno, Yukio Homma, Vik Khullar, Christopher Maher, Ian Milsom, Diane K. Newman, Rien J.M. Nijman, Kevin Rademakers, Dudley Robinson, Peter Rosier, Eric Rovner, Stefano Salvatore, Masayuki Takeda, Adrian Wagg, Todd H. Wagner, Alan Wein

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurourology and Urodynamics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPelvic floor disorders treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUrinary incontinenceGynecologyUrologyGeneral surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additional supporting information may be found in the online version of this article at the publisher's website. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.037
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.006
Bibliometrics0.0110.009
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0090.004
Research integrity0.0150.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1,106
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurourology and UrodynamicsSame topicPelvic floor disorders treatmentsFrench-language works237,207