MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021678284 · doi:10.1111/febs.13186

Poly(A)<sup>+</sup> mRNA‐binding protein Tudor‐SN regulates stress granules aggregation dynamics

2015· article· en· W2021678284 on OpenAlexaff
Xingjie Gao, Xue Fu, Juan Song, Yi Zhang, Xiaoteng Cui, Chao Su, Lin Ge, Jie Shao, Lingbiao Xin, Juha Saarikettu, Mei Mei, Xi Yang, Minxin Wei, Olli Silvennoinen, Zhi Yao, Jinyan He, Jie Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Mechanisms and Therapy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaApotex (Canada)
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsStress granuleP-bodiesMessenger RNACytoplasmRNA-binding proteinCell biologyMessenger RNPCytosolGene knockdownRNAPoly(A)-binding proteinBiologyMolecular biologyChemistryBiochemistryEnzymeGeneTranslation (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stress granules (SGs) and processing bodies (PBs) comprise the main types of cytoplasmic RNA foci during stress. Our previous data indicate that knockdown of human Tudor staphylococcal nuclease (Tudor-SN) affects the aggregation of SGs. However, the precise molecular mechanism has not been determined fully. In the present study, we demonstrate that Tudor-SN binds and colocalizes with many core components of SGs, such as poly(A)(+) mRNA binding protein 1, T-cell internal antigen-1-related protein and poly(A)(+) mRNA, and SG/PB sharing proteins Argonaute 1/2, but not PB core proteins, such as decapping enzyme 1 a/b, confirming that Tudor-SN is an SG-specific protein. We also demonstrate that the Tudor-SN granule actively communicates with the nuclear and cytosolic pool under stress conditions. Tudor-SN can regulate the aggregation dynamics of poly(A)(+) mRNA-containing SGs and selectively stabilize the SG-associated mRNA during cellular stress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS JournalSame topicCancer Mechanisms and TherapyFrench-language works237,207