MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021695196 · doi:10.1103/physreva.77.013819

Broadband optical coupling between microstructured fibers and photonic band gap circuits: Two-dimensional paradigms

2008· article· en· W2021695196 on OpenAlexafffund
James Bauer, Sajeev John

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotonic Crystals and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsPhotonic crystalOpticsYablonoviteCladding (metalworking)OptoelectronicsPhotonic-crystal fiberMaterials scienceTransmittancePhysicsCollimatorPhotonicsPhotonic integrated circuitOptical fiber

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We demonstrate high efficiency, broadband coupling between photonic crystal waveguides and photonic crystal fibers (PCFs) using simple two-dimensional design models. We demonstrate an effective large-bandwidth small-footprint beam collimator for light exiting a two-dimensional subwavelength scale photonic crystal waveguide consisting of an air core. This collimator relies on destructive interference between diffracted light from the mouth of the waveguide and the light emitted by surface resonators. We demonstrate efficient coupling between air-core photonic crystal waveguides and various two-dimensional models of photonic crystal fibers. A hollow-core photonic crystal fiber, described by an air defect with a Bragg stack cladding on either side, yields a coupling efficiency of better than 94% over a bandwidth of 25% of the center frequency, with peak transmittance exceeding 98%. A small-mode-area PCF, consisting of a subwavelength solid core attached by spokes to the PCF cladding, is modeled by a slab waveguide. In this latter case, we demonstrate coupling efficiency better than 94% over a bandwidth of 17%, with peak transmittance exceeding 99%. Combining collimation at the photonic crystal exit port and a nonadiabatic taper in a small-mode-area PCF, we obtain over 98% coupling efficiency over a bandwidth of $135\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{nm}$ centered at a wavelength of $1.5\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{m}$. These results provide valuable paradigms for efficient transfer of optical information between photonic band gap (PBG) microcircuits and PCF-enabled telecommunication networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.390
Threshold uncertainty score0.797

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicPhotonic Crystals and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207