Gauge/String Duality
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the past few years, we have witnessed rapid developments in the study of gauge/string dualities.The prototype of this duality is the AdS/CFT correspondence, originally conjectured as the duality between type IIB string theory in AdS 5 × S 5 with N units of R-R five-form flux and N 4 SU N super Yang Mills SYM theory in d 4 spacetime dimensions.There are many superb review articles on the subject of the AdS/CFT correspondence.More recently, the subject of holographic duality has been extended in diverse directions with surprising new results.One of these directions has been related to the applications of the holographic principles to realistic gauge theories which are not conformal such as QCD.It is widely agreed that an exact string dual to QCD is not known at present.Nevertheless, there are holographic models which share features of QCD such as confinement and deconfinement at high temperatures and chiral symmetry breaking, and restoration.However, these models do not exhibit the asymptotic freedom of QCD.They have, however, shed light on the properties of QCD in the strong coupling regime.Another area that has seen activity is the study of relativistic heavy ion collision RHIC , where a quark-gluon plasma is formed.Holographic principles have also been studied in nonrelativistic systems that promise to be relevant for the study of phase transitions and other phenomena in inherently strongly coupled systems in condensed matter physics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".