Evaluation of a Clonal Propagation Protocol to Obtain Replicated Disease Data on Infection by <i>Colletotrichum truncatum</i> in <i>Lens culinaris</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Colletotrichum truncatum causes anthracnose, a major disease of lentil ( Lens culinaris Medikus) on the Canadian prairies. Single‐plant phenotyping of resistance is unreliable, thus the feasibility of using clonal propagation of individual lentil plants to generate replicated ratings was evaluated. Experiments revealed that highly resistant and highly susceptible lines had consistent disease reactions in cutting‐ and seedling‐derived plants. However, the reaction of partially resistant lines differed and was attributed to differences in phenology between the treatments. When seedlings and replicated cuttings of an F 2 population were assessed for disease, it was found that segregation patterns of resistant to susceptible plants of the cuttings were consistent with the seedlings. It is proposed that the cutting method may be more dependable than using single‐plant evaluation for this pathosystem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".