MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Management of alloimmune thrombocytopenia

2007· article· en· W2021753387 on OpenAlex
H. H. H. Kanhai, Leendert Porcelijn, C. P. Engelfriet, H. W. Reesink, Sarah E. Panzer, Barbara Ulm, Mindy Goldman, Ines A. Bonacossa, Lucie Richard, Matthias David, Ellen Taaning, M Hedegaard, C. Kaplan, V. Kiefel, Oliver Meyer, A. Salama, F. Morelati, N. Greppi, M. Marconi, Beatrice Tassis, Nelson H. Tsuno, Keisuke Takahashi, Dick Oepkes, Humphrey H.H. Kanhai, L. T. N. Osnes, Anne Husebekk, M. K. Killie, Jens Kjeldsen‐Kragh, B. Zupanska, Eduardo Muñiz‐Díaz, Núria Nogués, Juan Parra, S. J. Urbaniak, R. Andrew Cameron

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueVox Sanguinis · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHéma-QuébecCanadian Blood Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary sciencePhilosophyMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fetal alloimmune thrombocytopenia is caused by maternal sensitization to paternally-derived antigens on fetal platelets, most commonly HPA-1a.1 It occurs in approximately 1 in 1000 live births and is the commonest cause of severe fetal and neonatal thrombocytopenia, and of intracranial hemorrhage in neonates born at term.2 Since there is currently no routine screening, first-time cases of fetal alloimmune thrombocytopenia are generally identified following the birth of a markedly thrombocytopenic neonate. Antenatal management is thus only possible in subsequent pregnancies.
\n
\nIntracranial hemorrhage is the most devastating complication of fetal alloimmune thrombocytopenia and often occurs antenatally. Assessment of projected clinical severity is thus based on the development of intracranial hemorrhage in a previous sibling. If there is such a history of intracranial hemorrhage, the chance of this complication occurring again in the next pregnancy is extremely high in an untreated, antigen-positive sibling.3
\n
\nAdministration of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) to the mother, initially given in conjunction with dexamethasone, was first used to prevent recurrence of antenatal intracranial hemorrhage in 1988.4 This approach of providing IVIG-based medical therapy administered to the mother to increase the fetal platelet count has since been extensively investigated in hundreds of maternal-fetal pairs.5 The efficacy of IVIG-based therapy has been supported by numerous studies6–16 (Table 1A) but not by others17–19 (Table 1B). The studies presented in Tables 1A and 1B surprisingly report virtually identical percentages of cases of intracranial hemorrhage: 2.7% versus 2.9%, respectively. However, overall mean birth platelet counts differed markedly between the two groups. While platelet counts are considered to be surrogate markers of intracranial hemorrhage, fortunately, the likelihood of fetal and neonatal intracranial hemorrhage, in the absence of this complication having occurred in a previous sibling, is relatively low.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score0.376

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it