Association between waking EEG slowing and REM sleep behavior disorder in PD without dementia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare nondemented patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) with and without REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) to healthy controls on quantitative EEG characteristics for both wakefulness and REM sleep. METHODS: Fifteen patients with PD (7 patients with polysomnographic-confirmed RBD [PD-RBD] and 8 patients without RBD [PD-NRBD]) and 15 healthy control subjects were studied. Each subject underwent a quantitative EEG analysis of both wakefulness and REM sleep. RESULTS: During wakefulness, patients with PD-RBD showed a higher theta power in frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital regions in comparison to patients with PD-NRBD and control subjects. Moreover, a slowing of the dominant occipital frequency was observed only in patients with PD-RBD (p < 0.02). Patients with PD-NRBD did not present any slowing of the EEG. No between-group difference in quantitative REM sleep EEG was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the EEG slowing reported during wakefulness in nondemented patients with PD is strongly related to the presence of RBD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".