Effects of CCK-tetrapeptide in patients with social phobia and obsessive-compulsive disorder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Panicogenic sensitivity to CCK-tetrapeptide (CCK-4) is enhanced in panic disorder patients relative to normal controls (NC). We sought to determine whether CCK-4 sensitivity is augmented in patients with social phobia (SP) (n = 12) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) (n = 8) versus NC (n = 12). We also determined whether CCK-4 could elicit syndrome-specific symptoms in SP and OCD patients. The study employed a single-blind, placebo-controlled, within-subject design. Behavioral, cardiovascular and hormonal responses to a submaximal dose (20 microg) of CCK-4 were evaluated. Panic frequency after the placebo and CCK-4 challenge varied as a function of diagnosis. Differences in panic frequency between groups and between challenge agents within each group did not, however, reach statistical significance. Further, the number and intensity of panic symptoms, intensity of subjective anxiety, autonomic reactivity and hormonal release after CCK-4 administration did not distinguish the groups. Core symptoms of SP and OCD were unaffected by CCK-4. These data failed to detect significant differences between groups on behavioral, cardiovascular and hormonal response to CCK-4. The lack of effect of CCK-4 on SP and OCD symptoms suggests that this peptide does not play a salient role in the pathophysiology of these disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".