MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021876087 · doi:10.1520/jai103021

Loading Mixity on the Interfacial Failure Mode in Lead-Free Solder Joint

2010· article· en· W2021876087 on OpenAlexaff
Feng Gao, Jianping Jing, Frank Z. Liang, Richard L. Williams, Jianmin Qu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of ASTM International · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceSolderingIntermetallicComposite materialAlloyUltimate tensile strengthJoint (building)Shear (geology)Failure mode and effects analysisShear strength (soil)MetallurgyStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, single solder joints (SSJs) were subjected to moderate speed loading (5 mm/s) in different directions, from pure tensile mixity mode to pure shear. Fracture surfaces from different loading directions were examined both experimentally and numerically. The intermetallic compound (IMC) is formed between the solder alloy and the Cu pad, and the failure typically occurs at or near the solder/IMC/Cu interfaces of the board side. Pure tensile loading typically leads to interfacial fracture along the IMC/Cu interface. Mixity mode loading usually results in a mixture of interfacial and cohesive failure with damage propagating in a zigzag fashion between the solder/IMC interface and the solder alloy. Loading with higher shear component tends to result in more cohesive failure of the solder alloy near the solder/IMC interface. Under pure shear loading, failure is almost always cohesive within the solder alloy near the solder/IMC interface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.178
Threshold uncertainty score0.536

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of ASTM InternationalSame topicElectronic Packaging and Soldering TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207