Eradication of Invasive Pneumococcal Disease due to the Seven-valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine Serotypes in Calgary, Alberta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The seven-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) was licensed in Canada in 2001. Routine infant vaccination programs in Alberta began in 2002. Several years after PCV7 introduction, the routine use of PCV7 in infants and high-risk children has led to near elimination of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) caused by vaccine serotypes. METHODS: Prospective, population-based surveillance of all IPD cases was conducted from January 1998 to December 2010. Demographic, clinical and microbiologic data were collected. RESULTS: There were 1462 IPD cases over 13 years. Comparing PCV7 serotype IPD incidence in the prevaccine period (1998-2001) to the late postvaccine period (2007-2010), there were declines in children 0-5 months (100%), 6-23 months (98%), 2-4 years (97%), 5-15 years (100%) as well as in adults 16-64 years (73%), 65-84 years (90%) and ≥85 years of age (100%). From 2008 to 2010, there were no cases of PCV7 serotype IPD in children under 2 years of age. There have been increases in non-PCV7 serotype IPD; notably, serotypes 5 and 19A have increased significantly in adults and 19A in children. CONCLUSIONS: PCV7 serotype IPD has been eliminated in vaccine-eligible young children and nearly eliminated in all other age groups. Serotype 19A increased significantly at all ages before the introduction of an expanded valency pneumococcal conjugate vaccine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".