Electrorotation of axolotl embryos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The frequency dependent dielectric properties of individual axolotl embryos (Ambystoma mexicanum) were investigated experimentally utilizing the technique of electrorotation. Individual axolotl embryos, immersed in low conductivity media, were subjected to a known frequency and fixed amplitude rotating AC electric field and the ensuing rotational motion of the embryo was monitored using a conventional optical microscope. None of the embryos in the pregastrulation or neurulation stages of development exhibited any rotational motion over the field frequency range (10 Hz-5 MHz). Over the same frequency range, the embryos in the gastrulation stage of development exhibited both co-field and counterfield rotation over different ranges of the applied field frequency. Typically, the counterfield rotation exhibited a peak in the rotation spectrum at similar 1 KHz while the co-field peak was located at similar 1-2 MHz. The rotational spectral data was analyzed using a multishelled spherical embryo model to determine the electrical character of embryos during the early development stages (Stages 5-16; i.e., 16 cell through open neural plate stages).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".