Theoretical modeling and interpretation of X-ray absorption spectra of liquid water
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report extensive calculations to examine the capability of theory to explain the XAS spectra of liquid water. Several aspects that enter the theoretical model are addressed, such as the quantum mechanical methods, the statistics and the XAS model. As input into our quantum mechanical calculations we will use structural information on liquid water obtained from first principles and from classical molecular dynamics simulations. As XAS models, we will examine the full core hole and the half core hole approximations to transition state theory. The quantum mechanics is performed on the basis of density functional theory. We conclude from this study that recent experimental results are fully consistent with, and can be completely explained by, present day theory, in particular, the pre-edge peak is reproduced. We also find that the average bond coordination in liquid water is 3.1 and that the assertion in a recent paper that the hydrogen bond number is much less than that cannot be substantiated. Our calculations emphasize that further advances in our understanding of water can only be made by more sophisticated spectroscopy with significantly increased resolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".