The Effect of Intramedullary Reaming on a Diaphyseal Bone Defect of the Tibia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The effect of intramedullary reaming on diaphyseal tibial defects has not been examined in the literature. The present aim was to relate the extent of reaming to angiogenesis and bone formation occurring around a critical-sized defect in the tibia for two scenarios, namely, when the bone defect is left empty and when the bone defect is treated with autograft. METHODS: Eleven canines were allocated into two groups, namely, empty (n=5) or iliac crest autograft (n=6). All tibiae were reamed to 7.0 mm and fixed with a 6.5-mm statically locked intramedullary nail after creation of an 8.0-mm diaphyseal defect. The extent of reaming of the canal was dependent on the cross-sectional area of the tibia, because all tibiae were reamed to 7.0 mm. Fluorescent markers were administered at different times: calcein green (6 weeks), xylenol orange (9 weeks), and tetracycline (11 weeks and 14 weeks). Animals were sacrificed at 15 weeks and perfused with a barium compound. Analysis consisted of radiography, micro-computed tomography scan, and histology. RESULTS: Linear regression analysis of percent bone volume and canal area provided a Pearson correlation coefficient of r=0.925 (p=0.025) for empty samples and r=0.244 (p=0.641) for autograft samples. Linear regression analysis of percent vasculature volume and canal area provided a Pearson correlation coefficient of r=0.784 (p=0.117) for empty samples and r=-0.146 (p=0.783) for autograft samples. Bone formation rates were reported as the distance between the fluorescent labels and were less within the endosteum, cortex, and periosteum, with extensive reaming in empty samples. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that limited reaming may be beneficial to the acute management of tibial shaft fractures with a bone defect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".